Early childhood developmental theories go
way back to the 1600s. In this post, I shall attempt in describing 3 schools of
thought: Behaviourists, Maturationists/Humanists, and Constructivists.
These schools of thought will be analysed
according to how children learn, the role of mistakes in development, and the
role of the teacher.
During the Colonial Times in the
1600s, children were treated as sinful, and girls were
not allowed to study.
During this period, children were seen as
weak and needed adults to shape them to the “right” path. The punishment was
deemed as necessary, though there are parents who fought against that. It was
during this time that Comenius stood out as an advocate for equal education for
boys and girls.
Romanticism began in the 1700s, two groups
of people emerged: Behaviourists & Humanists/Maturationists.
Behaviourists believed children were blank
slates, and that children can only learn from systematic and rote instruction. The
teaching style is more nurturing. This practice can still be seen in modern
preschools. John Locke, Pavlov, and Skinner were key theorists who supported
behaviourism. Also during romanticism, humanists or maturationists emerged.
Nature is more prioritised than nurture, and Rousseau and Pestalozzi were key
theorists. Two programmes were formed from this school of thought, headed by
Froebel and Montesorri. Froebel believed in gifts, and adults should guide
children in symbolic learning through play. During the late 1800s,
progressivists emerged also. Dewey is a key figure.
Constructivism happened during the 1900s. Children
are believed to be curious learners, not passive receivers of knowledge. Piaget,
Vygotsky, and Gardner were key theorists. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory
also started. Preschool models such as Reggio Emilia, Bankstreet, and High
Scope were also introduced.
The 1600s: Colonial Times
The 1700s: Romanticism (Behaviorists,
Maturationists/Humanists)
The 1800s: Romanticism (Progressivists)
The 1900s: Constructivism
Behaviourists
|
Constructivists
|
Maturationists
|
|
Assumptions about how development occurs
|
Blank slate, passive recipients of knowledge,
nurture supersedes nature
|
Children are viewed as needing to actively explore
their learning environments to build their understandings of the world
|
Development is a biological process that occurs
automatically in predictable, sequential stages over time. Development
unfolds according to nature’s inner plan or timetable.
|
Assumptions about how children learn
|
Development is considered a reaction to rewards,
punishments, stimuli and reinforcement
|
Learning and development occur when young children
interact with the environment and people around them
|
Acquire knowledge naturally and automatically as
they grow physically and become older, if they are healthy.
|
Role of the environment
|
Key to development
|
Biologically and genetically predetermined patterns
of change have a greater impact on development than environmental influences.
|
|
Role of the teacher
|
The teacher is the dominant person in the classroom
and takes complete control of children’s learning
|
Teacher to scaffold and co-construct knowledge with children-
provides experiences which will promote learning
|
|
The role of mistakes in development
|
They don’t tolerate mistakes.
|
Helps them to construct knowledge, the process of learning.
|
Mistakes are important, give them time.
|
Key Theorists
|
John Locke, Pavlov, Skinner
|
Jean Piaget, Lev Vygotsky, Howard Gardner
|
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Johann Pestalozzi, Arnold
Gesell, Montessori
|
I believe in both the behaviourists and constructivists.
Children are blank slates, as they are waiting for knowledge to be taught to
them and hence they are easily influenced by key adult figures in their lives,
but they are also capable to be curious in finding out more, deeper concepts
than what is already taught to them. The curriculum should be equally balanced
between teacher-directed and child-directed. Jean Piaget is the theorist that
impacted me the most, since my diploma days.
References
Chen, D. (2020). ECE102 Children as thinkers and
meaning makers (study guide). Singapore: Singapore University of Social
Sciences.
No comments:
Post a Comment